1) These decision-makers typically work out the pros and cons of a situation based on what they know. They are rational and have a low tolerance for ambiguity. Their decisions are derived from their own knowledge, experience, and rationale, rather than going to other people for more information. The positive aspects of this style is decision-making is it’s quick, ownership is clear, and it doesn’t require extra communication. However, these decisions can sometimes be made impulsively, without all the necessary information. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 2) These decision-makers examine considerable information before taking action. For example, they rely on direct observation, data, and facts to support their decisions. However, they will seek information and advice from others to confirm or deny their own knowledge. These decision-makers have a high tolerance for ambiguity and are very adaptable, but they like to control most aspects of the decision process. This style is a well-rounded approach to decision-making but can be time-consuming. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 3) These decision makers take a more social approach to decision-making. They encourage creative thinking and collaboration and consider a broad array of perspectives. These decision-makers are achievement-oriented and like to think far into the future when making important decisions. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 4) These decision-makers try to make sure everyone works well together. This decision-making is group-oriented; however, rather than brainstorming potential solutions, the group is given the options available to them. From there, the group discusses the pros and cons of each choice. This style of decision-making considers many different outlooks and opinions in the process. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 5) This style lends itself well to situations characterized by stability, repeating patterns, and consistent events. It is best used for situations where there is a clear and undisputed cause-and-effect relationship. This means that a correct answer exists and is understood collectively. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 6) These decisions are helpful in situations where there may be more than one right answer. Use this style of decision-making to solve problems where the cause-and-effect relationship is discoverable but not immediately apparent. Primarily, you’re using this approach to explore several options or solutions and using fact-based management to guide appropriate action. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 7) Apply this style to problems that involve many competing ideas. This style of decision is best suited for situations characterized by unpredictability and suited to creative and innovative approaches. In these scenarios, you find there is no immediate solution, but patterns emerge over time. Using this style of decision-making accounts for long-term planning and unknown variables. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 8) This style requires proactive communication and takes a more introspective approach by discussing solutions that have worked in the past rather than trying to reveal new patterns. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 9) Avoid using this style to make complex jobs seem simpler than they are. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 10) The most significant warning sign of overuse of this decision style is decision paralysis. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 11) If the decision you need to make involves a situation that needs structure and defined outcomes, you shouldn’t use this approach. As well, decisions that need to drive immediate results and circumstances where there is little room for error do not fall under this approach. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural 12) If group discussion sessions never reach an agreement, you may need to consider another approach. In contrast, if new ideas never come up or no one challenges opinions, this decision-making may not be the best option either. While this style of decision works to benefit the group as a whole, it requires a definite and decisive leader to get things accomplished. If necessary, look for ways and experiments to force people to think outside of what’s familiar. a) Directive b) Analytical c) Conceptual d) Behavioural

Decision-Making Styles

by
Print
Embed

Leaderboard

Visual style

Options

Switch template

Continue editing: ?