Giving an opinion: If you ask me, the main issue isn’t cost; it’s consistency., What I’m saying is, we need a realistic plan, not just a nice idea., From my point of view, this policy would do more harm than good., Agreeing: That’s a fair point, especially when you look at the data., We’re basically on the same page., True that! → (slang), Disagreeing politely: I see it differently. I think the costs would outweigh the benefits., I don’t buy that argument, mainly because it..., I’m not sure I agree with that, because the situation is more complex., Asking for clarification / challenging a point: What exactly do you mean by...?, Are you saying that we should accept lower quality to save money?, What’s your evidence for that?, Supporting your point: The main reason is, it reduces uncertainty., This matters because it affects both performance and morale., To give a practical example, a manager might use this to prevent conflict., Comparing options / weighing pros and cons: The upside is… The downside is…, The trade-off is higher cost in exchange for better results., It comes down to whether we value speed or quality more.,

Debate | Functional Language

by
Print
Embed

Leaderboard

Visual style

Options

Switch template

Continue editing: ?